This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Good morning,

The AI leaders holding the reins of our entire economy have some pretty unconventional ideas about economics. So does the Treasury Secretary.

They’re both struggling.

David Z. Morris and Austin Campbell

P.S. If this email was forwarded to you, please subscribe to get our regular in-depth reports.

TECH

AI: The Depressing Pause

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei last week published a 3,800 word essay about “pacing” the development of frontier AI models. Other AI figures including Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Google’s Demis Hassabis quickly made public statements with varying degrees of agreement on direction, if not the specifics of the plan.

The proximate trigger for the statement were the recent series of cybersecurity incidents which AI labs characterized as agents “going rogue.” That framing has been heavily criticized as shifting responsibility away from the labs themselves, and the “pause” talk is similarly triggering scrutiny.

One pillar of Amodei’s proposal was the integration of “embedded third-party evaluators” for model releases - but METR, the entity Amodei nominates for an oversight role, is funded by the same sources as Anthropic itself, including Facebook co-founder and Effective Altruism overlord Dustin Moskovitz.

AUSTIN

This is what regulatory capture looks like, and what an industry trying to circle the wagons to protect themselves and kill competition in the cradle would do. There’s also the open question of economics. Suffice to say, if banks did this, everyone would rightly see it as pure lust for power and greed. Is AI any different?

Skeptics are questioning whether doom worries are the real motivator here. As we covered in depth in Zero In recently, the cost of AI data center buildouts are becoming burdensome, just as OpenAI and Anthropic both prepare for IPOs that will require major financial disclosures.

Cutting expenses for training could help make those numbers look better. But for those not terrified of an AI apocalypse, it also looks more than a little like open collusion between the industry’s major players.

Perhaps inconveniently, President Donald Trump responded by calling AI anxiety a “hoax” and a “sick conspiracy.” Trump then called Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang in the middle of a speech at the All In Summit, and Huang thanked Trump for trying to derail the doom-trolling.

Also notably absent from any agreement on a pause or slowdown are both Meta and the Chinese AI labs. In fact, Yann LeCun, formerly of Meta, said “Dario was already claiming that GPT2 was too dangerous to open source back in 2019. I made fun of them then. Everyone should make fun of them now.” Similarly, Liu Shengyu (刘胜与), at the Chinese AI lab DeepSeek, said that he does not want Anthropic to hold the most advanced AI/AGI; “to put it dramatically,” that would be comparable to Hitler getting the bomb first.

China’s MFA also derided Dario’s letter as fear-mongering, and may have killed the global AI pause before it could begin: Dario’s own letter notes it would require governments to enforce. That’s going to be difficult if the 2nd most influential government on AI policy has already said it would not participate.

Perhaps we will have to rename it Ineffective Altriusm?

DAVID

It’s hard to tell exactly where AI promoters’ muddled thinking turns into malfeasance - much like their adherent and funder Sam Bankman-Fried, who funneled $500m in stolen funds into Anthropic. It may have been a shot in the dark, but Trump is not exactly incorrect to call this a conspiracy.

MORE TECH:

DEALS

POLICY

Revolut Didn’t Get Hacked - It Was Worse Than That

Neobank Revolut suffered a serious breach of customer data, and international anti-money laundering regulations are to blame.

According to Protos, leaked data “included names, dates of birth, addresses, email addresses and phone numbers, alongside copies of passports and driving licences.” That could be enough data to seriously compromise customer safety and security.

Revolut has stated only that a “very limited” number of customers were impacted, but the nature of this breach is more important than its scale. According to a spokesperson, “Revolut recently identified a sophisticated external impersonation scam where an unauthorised third party utilised a legitimate government agency domain email to submit fraudulent requests for information.”

AUSTIN

This is a grim parallel with police misuse of Flock cameras in the U.S.A. In both cases, bad actors used surveillance policy to steal information. In both cases, the problem is that the data has been gathered into one easily-exploitable honeypot.

Sleuths have concluded that an EU member country was used as a sockpuppet by hackers to compel Revolut to hand over customer information, in accordance with regional anti-money laundering policy. Refusal to comply with the request would have put Revolut in violation - yet they had no handshake procedure to confirm that the government request was genuine.

DAVID

Constantly generating and storing more sensitive customer data is an insane way to run a system that’s supposedly meant to protect people. There are new, more secure ways to do this. Some of them, purely by coincidence, use Zero Knowledge Proofs to validate compliance while protecting customer data.

MORE POLICY:
  • Hunter Biden’s memetic redemption arc has been undercut by a memecoin launch that immediately dumped. The ticker, of course, is $LAPTOP ( ▼ 9.03% ).

  • Comedian Nathan Fielder released a magnetic teaser for “You Can See Everything,” a documentary about notorious Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes. Anticipation is electric.

ZERO INSIGHTS

Deep Dives on Critical Topics

Make ICOs Great Again

“Reg Crypto” would resurrect token sales.

AI 2060

Of closed weights and closed societies.

The Albatross’s Bill

The Data Center Debt Stack, Explained.

FINANCE

Energy Off the Rails

Brent crude peaked north of $109 after Saudi Arabia said it would close a critical pipeline after a drone attack originating in Iraq, and the breakdown of negotiations with Iran. Mounting knock-on effects of Donald Trump’s war on Iran seemed to reach a critical threshold, with deisel fuel hitting an all-time high in the U.S. Natural gas was already outpacing the ECB’s worst-case projections - then it jumped another 6%.

AUSTIN

As I recently commented on Bits + Bips, interest rates can’t create more atoms. An energy crisis can’t be solved by flipping financial switches, and this one is looming at a particularly bad time.

Those disruptions could blow back on particularly inconvenient bystanders: data centers, which notoriously consume a heck of a lot of electricity and often rely on natural gas power generation. OpenAI’s delayed IPO in particular exposes them to cost risk if the situation continues to escalate.

This also naturally exacerbates both global inflation worries and an arguably emergent international debt crisis. It’s not just Scott Bessent getting desperate to throw hands at the yield curve.

DAVID

Iran’s ability to control the Strait, and the dire consequences of that control, have been understood by every U.S. administration for going on half a century … yet it escaped this President and his Department of War.

MORE FINANCE:

READ MORE

Thanks for reading.

Talk to you again soon.

Austin Campbell, CEO

David Morris, Managing Editor

Shirley Yu, Executive Producer

ZERO INPUT

Rate our letter.

Login or Subscribe to participate

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Recommended for you

View all
caret-right